Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (20 vs 7 shots).
- Pacific FC was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 15%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 400Lead | Accurate passes | 305 |
| 473Lead | Total passes | 387 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.