Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (22 vs 4 shots).
- Pacific FC was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 36%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 489Lead | Accurate passes | 220 |
| 566Lead | Total passes | 291 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |