Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Vancouver FC was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Vancouver Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 10Lead |
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Vancouver Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 293 | Accurate passes | 305Lead |
| 361 | Total passes | 385Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Vancouver Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Vancouver Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Vancouver Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |