Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.64 vs 0.48, Δ 1.16).
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- York United was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | York United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.64Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | York United |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 350Lead | Accurate passes | 302 |
| 415Lead | Total passes | 366 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | York United |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | York United |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | York United |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.