Match statistics snapshot
- Ceara created the clearer chances on xG (1.95 vs 0.92, Δ 1.03).
- Amazonas fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Ceara was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 33%).
Ceara vs Amazonas
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ceara | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.95Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.92 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ceara | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 274 | Accurate passes | 459Lead |
| 335 | Total passes | 536Lead |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ceara | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ceara | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ceara | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |