Match statistics snapshot
- Botafogo created the clearer chances on xG (0.93 vs 1.36, Δ 0.43).
- Ceara fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- Botafogo was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ceara | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.93 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.36Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ceara | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 333Lead | Accurate passes | 330 |
| 392 | Total passes | 392 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ceara | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ceara | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.21 | Goals prevented | 0.21 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ceara | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |