Match statistics snapshot
- Ceara created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 0.89, Δ 0.32).
- Ceara fired more attempts (21 vs 6 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ceara | Statistic | Botafogo Sp |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.89 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ceara | Statistic | Botafogo Sp |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 306 | Accurate passes | 322Lead |
| 382 | Total passes | 402Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ceara | Statistic | Botafogo Sp |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ceara | Statistic | Botafogo Sp |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ceara | Statistic | Botafogo Sp |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |