Match statistics snapshot
- Flamengo created the clearer chances on xG (0.65 vs 1.05, Δ 0.40).
- Flamengo fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Ceara was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ceara | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ceara | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 209 | Accurate passes | 548Lead |
| 274 | Total passes | 627Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ceara | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ceara | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.66 | Goals prevented | 0.66 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ceara | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.