Match statistics snapshot
- Ceara created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 0.81, Δ 0.61).
- Ceara was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- Gremio held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ceara | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ceara | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 176 | Accurate passes | 314Lead |
| 237 | Total passes | 383Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ceara | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ceara | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.28 | Goals prevented | 0.28 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ceara | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.