Match statistics snapshot
- Guarani Campinas created the clearer chances on xG (0.63 vs 1.11, Δ 0.48).
- Ceara fired more attempts (8 vs 5 shots).
- Ceara was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ceara | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.11Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ceara | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 265 | Accurate passes | 325Lead |
| 351 | Total passes | 412Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ceara | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ceara | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ceara | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.