Match statistics snapshot
- Ceara created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 0.53, Δ 0.33).
- Ceara fired more attempts (22 vs 4 shots).
- Mirassol was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ceara | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ceara | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 364Lead | Accurate passes | 290 |
| 415Lead | Total passes | 360 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ceara | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ceara | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 1.96 | Goals prevented | 1.96 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ceara | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |