Match statistics snapshot
- Ponte Preta created the clearer chances on xG (1.01 vs 1.25, Δ 0.24).
- Ceara fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Ceara was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ceara | Statistic | Ponte Preta |
|---|---|---|
| 1.01 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ceara | Statistic | Ponte Preta |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 348Lead | Accurate passes | 213 |
| 438Lead | Total passes | 300 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ceara | Statistic | Ponte Preta |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ceara | Statistic | Ponte Preta |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ceara | Statistic | Ponte Preta |
|---|---|---|
| 18Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.