Match statistics snapshot
- Ceara created the clearer chances on xG (2.14 vs 1.14, Δ 1.00).
- Vasco DA Gama was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 18%).
- Vasco DA Gama held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ceara | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 2.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ceara | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 271 | Accurate passes | 550Lead |
| 335 | Total passes | 618Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ceara | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ceara | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.10 | Goals prevented | -0.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ceara | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |