Match statistics snapshot
- Alaves created the clearer chances on xG (0.83 vs 1.60, Δ 0.77).
- Alaves fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Celta Vigo was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
| 0.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.60Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 471Lead | Accurate passes | 218 |
| 551Lead | Total passes | 299 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.26 | Goals prevented | -0.26 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 23 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |