Match statistics snapshot
- Celta Vigo created the clearer chances on xG (0.77 vs 0.22, Δ 0.55).
- Celta Vigo fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Celta Vigo was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 0.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.22 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 427Lead | Accurate passes | 357 |
| 522Lead | Total passes | 462 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |