Match statistics snapshot
- Athletic Club created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 1.61, Δ 0.26).
- Athletic Club fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- Celta Vigo was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.61Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 415 | Accurate passes | 427Lead |
| 507Lead | Total passes | 492 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.68 | Goals prevented | -0.68 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |