Match statistics snapshot
- Celta Vigo created the clearer chances on xG (3.99 vs 0.98, Δ 3.01).
- Celta Vigo fired more attempts (21 vs 9 shots).
- Celta Vigo was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Las Palmas |
|---|---|---|
| 3.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98 |
| 6 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Las Palmas |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 284 | Accurate passes | 696Lead |
| 344 | Total passes | 765Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Las Palmas |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Las Palmas |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Las Palmas |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.