Match statistics snapshot
- Celta Vigo created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 0.33, Δ 0.65).
- Celta Vigo fired more attempts (20 vs 4 shots).
- Las Palmas was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Las Palmas |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.33 |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Las Palmas |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 559Lead | Accurate passes | 325 |
| 638Lead | Total passes | 412 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Las Palmas |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Las Palmas |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.63 | Goals prevented | 0.63 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Las Palmas |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.