Match statistics snapshot
- Celtic fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- Celtic was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 20%).
- Celtic held more of the ball (88% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Celtic | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 3 |
| 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Celtic | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 88%Lead | Ball possession | 12% |
| 93%Lead | Pass accuracy | 50% |
| 950Lead | Accurate passes | 72 |
| 1025Lead | Total passes | 145 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Celtic | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Celtic | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Celtic | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |