Match statistics snapshot
- Central Cordoba de Santiago fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 33%).
- Central Cordoba de Santiago held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Central Cordoba De Santiago | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Central Cordoba De Santiago | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 454Lead | Accurate passes | 161 |
| 536Lead | Total passes | 240 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Central Cordoba De Santiago | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Central Cordoba De Santiago | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Central Cordoba De Santiago | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.