Match statistics snapshot
- Ceramica Cleopatra fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Enppi was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 28%).
- Ceramica Cleopatra held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 441Lead | Accurate passes | 230 |
| 539Lead | Total passes | 328 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.