Match statistics snapshot
- Ceramica Cleopatra fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Ceramica Cleopatra was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 29%).
- Ceramica Cleopatra held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 489Lead | Accurate passes | 285 |
| 543Lead | Total passes | 336 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Additional tracked metrics for this fixture.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Free Kicks | 11 |