Match statistics snapshot
- Zamalek SC fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- Ceramica Cleopatra was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 22%).
- Zamalek SC held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 251 | Accurate passes | 370Lead |
| 334 | Total passes | 443Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.