Match statistics snapshot
- Antwerp created the clearer chances on xG (1.48 vs 1.52, Δ 0.04).
- Antwerp was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 13%).
- Antwerp held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 1.48 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 58% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 184 | Accurate passes | 379Lead |
| 317 | Total passes | 510Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.