Match statistics snapshot
- Cercle Brugge created the clearer chances on xG (3.79 vs 1.05, Δ 2.74).
- Cercle Brugge fired more attempts (22 vs 4 shots).
- Beerschot VA was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Beerschot Va |
|---|---|---|
| 3.79Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Beerschot Va |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 328Lead | Accurate passes | 319 |
| 429Lead | Total passes | 419 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Beerschot Va |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Beerschot Va |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.83 | Goals prevented | 0.83 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Beerschot Va |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |