Match statistics snapshot
- Club Brugge KV created the clearer chances on xG (1.51 vs 2.83, Δ 1.32).
- Club Brugge KV fired more attempts (28 vs 10 shots).
- Cercle Brugge was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 1.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.83Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 22Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 28Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 138 | Accurate passes | 381Lead |
| 231 | Total passes | 480Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |