Match statistics snapshot
- Cercle Brugge created the clearer chances on xG (2.53 vs 2.15, Δ 0.38).
- Cercle Brugge fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Genk was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 2.53Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.15 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 58% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 165 | Accurate passes | 379Lead |
| 283 | Total passes | 507Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.