Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (0.82 vs 4.52, Δ 3.70).
- Genk fired more attempts (24 vs 10 shots).
- Genk was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 0.82 | Expected goals (xG) | 4.52Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 19Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 12Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 182 | Accurate passes | 478Lead |
| 302 | Total passes | 588Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.93 | Goals prevented | -0.93 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cercle Brugge | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |