Match statistics snapshot
- Cerezo Osaka created the clearer chances on xG (2.37 vs 1.89, Δ 0.48).
- Cerezo Osaka fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- FC Tokyo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 41%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.89 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 408Lead | Accurate passes | 203 |
| 493Lead | Total passes | 297 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |