Match statistics snapshot
- Cerezo Osaka created the clearer chances on xG (1.52 vs 1.00, Δ 0.52).
- Cerezo Osaka fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Cerezo Osaka held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.52Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 336Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 438Lead | Total passes | 300 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 27 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |