Match statistics snapshot
- Cerezo Osaka created the clearer chances on xG (1.01 vs 0.54, Δ 0.47).
- Cerezo Osaka fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Gamba Osaka held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 1.01Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.54 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 273 | Accurate passes | 412Lead |
| 361 | Total passes | 523Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.