Match statistics snapshot
- Kyoto Sanga created the clearer chances on xG (2.34 vs 3.51, Δ 1.17).
- Kyoto Sanga fired more attempts (23 vs 19 shots).
- Cerezo Osaka held more of the ball (73% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 2.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.51Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 19 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 515Lead | Accurate passes | 161 |
| 609Lead | Total passes | 226 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.