Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Cerezo Osaka was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 33%).
- Nagoya Grampus held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 225 | Accurate passes | 385Lead |
| 277 | Total passes | 440Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.