Match statistics snapshot
- Cerro Porteno created the clearer chances on xG (1.99 vs 1.22, Δ 0.77).
- Cerro Porteno fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- 2 de Mayo was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22 |
| 8 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 382Lead | Accurate passes | 172 |
| 467Lead | Total passes | 267 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 9 |
Statistics is not available yet.