Match statistics snapshot
- Cerro Porteno created the clearer chances on xG (2.23 vs 0.10, Δ 2.13).
- Cerro Porteno fired more attempts (18 vs 5 shots).
- Cerro Porteno was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.10 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 494Lead | Accurate passes | 319 |
| 555Lead | Total passes | 380 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.