Match statistics snapshot
- Colo Colo created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 1.95, Δ 0.82).
- Cerro Porteno fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Colo Colo was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.95Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 238 | Accurate passes | 321Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 437Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.21 | Goals prevented | 0.21 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.