Match statistics snapshot
- Cerro Porteno created the clearer chances on xG (0.38 vs 0.18, Δ 0.20).
- Cerro Porteno fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Cerro Porteno was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 0.38Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.18 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 27% | Ball possession | 73%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 200 | Accurate passes | 635Lead |
| 256 | Total passes | 695Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.