Match statistics snapshot
- Cerro Porteno created the clearer chances on xG (2.46 vs 1.12, Δ 1.34).
- Cerro Porteno fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Cerro Porteno was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | General Caballero |
|---|---|---|
| 2.46Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | General Caballero |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 430Lead | Accurate passes | 180 |
| 501Lead | Total passes | 261 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | General Caballero |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | General Caballero |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | General Caballero |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |