Match statistics snapshot
- Cerro Porteno created the clearer chances on xG (1.95 vs 0.28, Δ 1.67).
- Cerro Porteno fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Cerro Porteno was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Olimpia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.95Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.28 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Olimpia |
|---|---|---|
| 74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 50% |
| 315Lead | Accurate passes | 69 |
| 386Lead | Total passes | 137 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Olimpia |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Olimpia |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Olimpia |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |