Match statistics snapshot
- Cerro Porteno fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Cerro Porteno was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 25%).
- Cerro Porteno held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Rubio Nu |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 1 |
| 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Rubio Nu |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 414Lead | Accurate passes | 280 |
| 499Lead | Total passes | 369 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Rubio Nu |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Rubio Nu |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerro Porteno | Statistic | Rubio Nu |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |