Match statistics snapshot
- Cesena created the clearer chances on xG (2.25 vs 1.80, Δ 0.45).
- Cesena fired more attempts (30 vs 13 shots).
- Padova was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cesena | Statistic | Padova |
|---|---|---|
| 2.25Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.80 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 22Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 30Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cesena | Statistic | Padova |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 434Lead | Accurate passes | 306 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 371 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cesena | Statistic | Padova |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cesena | Statistic | Padova |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| -0.93 | Goals prevented | -0.93 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cesena | Statistic | Padova |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.