Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (1.96 vs 0.94, Δ 1.02).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 1.96Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94 |
| Offsides | ||
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 305 | Accurate passes | 317Lead |
| 371 | Total passes | 393Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -1.39 | Goals prevented | -1.39 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.