Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (2.02 vs 0.25, Δ 1.77).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 2.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.25 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 337 | Accurate passes | 417Lead |
| 411 | Total passes | 496Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.