Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (1.29 vs 1.52, Δ 0.23).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1.29 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 573Lead | Accurate passes | 375 |
| 628Lead | Total passes | 430 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 2.00 | Goals prevented | 2.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.