Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (1.77 vs 0.57, Δ 1.20).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.57 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 559Lead | Accurate passes | 209 |
| 633Lead | Total passes | 288 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.69 | Goals prevented | 0.69 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.