Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (1.66 vs 0.38, Δ 1.28).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.66Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.38 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 330 |
| 430Lead | Total passes | 400 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.