Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 0.66, Δ 0.45).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 405 | Accurate passes | 515Lead |
| 474 | Total passes | 584Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.66 | Goals prevented | -0.66 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.