Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (0.84 vs 1.40, Δ 0.56).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0.84 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.40Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 397Lead | Accurate passes | 389 |
| 456 | Total passes | 459Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.87 | Goals prevented | 0.87 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.