Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (2.05 vs 2.43, Δ 0.38).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2.05 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.43Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 310 | Accurate passes | 386Lead |
| 407 | Total passes | 478Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.