Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.82 vs 2.26, Δ 0.44).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1.82 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.26Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 424 | Accurate passes | 565Lead |
| 497 | Total passes | 638Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |